Box Relatives

Thoughts about puzzles, math, coding, and miscellaneous

2201 Fascinating “Facts”

| 2 Comments

When I was a wee trivia buff, I received a book called “2201 Fascinating Facts.” In fact, if I remember correctly, I actually received *two* copies of it within the span of a year or so. And I loved it. I read it several times in my youth and learned lots of wonderful facts. But in the internet age, you actually get to learn what is a fact and what is not, thanks to Snopes and the invaluable List of Common Misconceptions page on Wikipedia. And since that time, I have learned that A LOT of the “facts” in the book are not so. Such things include:

  • The Great Wall of China is the only manmade structure visible from space (debunking)
  • You can see the stars in daytime from the bottom of a well (debunking)
  • The deer botfly can travel more than 800 miles per hour (debunking)

And the one that brought all this back to mind: a duck’s quack doesn’t echo (debunking). So now I’m totally skeptical of anything and everything I’ve read in that book. Here’s what I’m going to do: I’m going to start reading it again to (a) brush up on my trivia knowledge and (b) brush away all the false facts I’ve learned by researching any claims that seem suspect.

A first one that has always seemed suspect to me: there is a claim that some royal figure described St. Paul’s cathedral as “awful and artificial” — meaning it as a compliment! Supposedly, “awful” meant “awe-inspiring” and “artificial” meant “full of great art.” This is actually retold in several places including some that inspire confidence, but no one seems sure of its accuracy and there doesn’t seem to be an official debunking (or, um, bunking). Can anyone find anything about that?

All right, this blog is going to start detailing my journey. There may not be as many mistakes as I think there are, but I have to know. And you’re all coming along for the ride.

2 Comments

  1. Richard Lederer’s “Crazy English” (p. 86) describes the monarch as Queen Anne and quotes her as describing the church as “awful, artificial, and amusing.” Where Lederer gets the story from, I don’t know …

  2. No source, but it seems quite unlikely that the monarch would choose only three adjectives beginning with A whose meaning is about to change to something quite different. I’ll claim that most words haven’t changed meaning in that time. I suspect that it was invented as a modern imaginary demonstration of words changing meanings.

    In some tellings one of the three words is “pompous” and/or it is King James II. It seems to stick mostly to St Paul’s Cathedral.

Leave a Reply

Required fields are marked *.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.